On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:17:29PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> This was tried, trust me. We didn't create this list because someone
> forgot to respond to a single posting. As we wrote in the announcement
> there has been too many incidents: At least two people got kicked off
> the old lvm list for posting comments about the latest release using
> lower bits in pointers to store data. Other people have posted patches
> for serious bugs like NULL pointer dereferences and the postings were
> denied. Another person complained about the behavior and got no
> response.
What are you talking about??? Got kicked off? If so, it was not
intentional, I can assure you. That would just be stupid. As far as
patches being rejected, refer to the e-mail I just sent.
> For modules included in the Linux kernel, an open development forum is
> a minimum requirement.
Who asked for this? Who did you talk to? I haven't seen anything to this
effect for months.
-- AJ Lewis Sistina Software Inc. Voice: 612-379-3951 1313 5th St SE, Suite 111 Fax: 612-379-3952 Minneapolis, MN 55414 E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com http://www.sistina.comCurrent GPG fingerprint = 3B5F 6011 5216 76A5 2F6B 52A0 941E 1261 0029 2648 Get my key at: http://www.sistina.com/~lewis/gpgkey (Unfortunately, the PKS-type keyservers do not work with multiple sub-keys)
-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote---------------------------------------- Over and over I find being redundant is key to success in the art of redundancy - Jay Armstrong -----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:32 EST