Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 23:10:59 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.4.2-ac27 - read on /proc/bus/pci/devices never finishes after rmmod aic7xxx"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Hangs under 2.4.2-ac{18,19,24} that do not happen under -ac12."
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Next in thread: Woller, Thomas: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I know on ACPI systems you are guaranteed a PM timer running at ~3.57 Mhz.
> Could udelay use that, or are there other timers that are better (maybe
> without the ACPI dependency)?

We could use that if ACPI was present. It might be worth exploring. Is this
PM timer well defined for accesses ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.4.2-ac27 - read on /proc/bus/pci/devices never finishes after rmmod aic7xxx"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Hangs under 2.4.2-ac{18,19,24} that do not happen under -ac12."
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Next in thread: Woller, Thomas: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:20 EST