Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 21:23:14 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Larger dev_t"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: module depencies during startup"
In reply to: Jens Gecius: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Next in thread: John Madden: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Reply: John Madden: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Then, my question will be, why is the kernel loosing the irq for eth1
> and gets unusable?

In the APIC case on many intel boards it appears to be a hardware bug. THere
is a workaround for the apic problems in -ac

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Larger dev_t"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: module depencies during startup"
In reply to: Jens Gecius: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Next in thread: John Madden: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Reply: John Madden: "Re: 2.4.2 and NETDEV WATCHDOG - different bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:17 EST