Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2001 - 14:20:17 EST

Next message: gabor@swszl.szkp.uni-miskolc.hu: "2.4.2,mount --bind, system hangs"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
Next in thread: Jes Sorensen: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit processor.

You realise that this'll double the price of storage? ;)

(at least, in a year or two)

Rik

-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: gabor@swszl.szkp.uni-miskolc.hu: "2.4.2,mount --bind, system hangs"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
Next in thread: Jes Sorensen: "Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:14 EST