Re: [PATCH] OOM handling

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sun Mar 25 2001 - 12:08:03 EST

Next message: Gerry: "Re: Larger dev_t"
Previous message: Michel Wilson: "RE: Larger dev_t"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] OOM handling"
Next in thread: Jonathan Morton: "Re: [PATCH] OOM handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:

> > - the AGE_FACTOR calculation will overflow after the system has
> > an uptime of just _3_ days
>
> I esp. the behaviour will be predictable.

Ummmm ?

Rik

-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gerry: "Re: Larger dev_t"
Previous message: Michel Wilson: "RE: Larger dev_t"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] OOM handling"
Next in thread: Jonathan Morton: "Re: [PATCH] OOM handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:00:11 EST