Re: [linux-lvm] EXT2-fs panic (device lvm(58,0)):

From: Alexander Viro (aviro@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 21:04:15 EST


On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 01:35:05PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> > The only remote possibility is in ext2_free_blocks() if block+count
> > overflows a 32-bit unsigned value. Only 2 places call ext2_free_blocks()
> > with a count != 1, and ext2_free_data() looks to be OK. The other
> > possibility is that i_prealloc_count is bogus - that is it! Nowhere
> > is i_prealloc_count initialized to zero AFAICS.
> >
> Did you ever push this to Alan and/or Linus? This looks pretty
> important!

It isn't. Check fs/inode.c::clean_inode(). Specifically,
        memset(&inode->u, 0, sizeof(inode->u));
The thing is called both by get_empty_inode() and by get_new_inode() (the
former - just before returning, the latter - just before calling
->read_inode()).
                                                                Cheers,
                                                                        Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST