On 03.23 Alan Cox wrote:
> > page_cache_release(page);
> > -out:
>
> out:;
>
Yes, a null sentence can shut up the compiler. But what is the purpose of
a jump to the end instead of a return ? Some optimization ?
> does that trick
>
> > - default:
> > + default:;
>
Same, I have not tested if gcc-3 will complain about a switch that not
covers all values (ie, no default:). But the logic thing would be to kill
the default: completely. Mmmm, and older compilers will eat it with no
default: ?
>
> The aic7xxx change looks right too. Someone with the hardware handy needs to
> check that one though.
>
It work on my 7880.
> As to the asm - I'll apply it to -ac if you can verify the asm after changes
> goes happily through the older gcc/binutils (should do) and send me a nice
> clean diff of just those changes
>
Is there a non-written standard for coding that asm's ?
For example:
" adcl 12(%1), %0\n"
"1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n"
" lea 4(%1), %1\n"
or
"adcl 12(%1), %0\n\t"
"1: adcl 16(%1), %0\n\t"
"lea 4(%1), %1\n\t"
-- J.A. Magallon # Let the source mailto:jamagallon@able.es # be with you, Luke...Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac21 #5 SMP Thu Mar 22 23:47:26 CET 2001 i686
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST