Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 08:32:35 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Previous message: Jun Sun: "eepro100 question: why SCBCmd byte is 0x80?"
In reply to: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> hdc: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> ide1: unexpected interrupt, status=0x58, count=1
> hdc: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> hdc: drive not ready for command
>
> all with the same timestamp in the syslog. (IRQ timeout followed by
> unexpected IRQ ... ??? Hrrm.)

Not *so* strange.

I'm waiting for interrupt. It does not come, so I start interrupt routine,
anyway.It finds something strange in registers, and says "unexpected interrupt".

-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"
Previous message: Jun Sun: "eepro100 question: why SCBCmd byte is 0x80?"
In reply to: Paul Gortmaker: "Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [PATCH] off-by-1 error in ide-probe (2.4.x)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST