On 22 Mar 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Is there ever a case where killing init is the right thing to do? My
> impression is that if init is selected the whole machine dies. If you
> can kill init and still have a machine that mostly works, then I guess
> it makes some sense not to kill it.
>
> Guaranteeing not to select init can buy you piece of mind because
> init if properly setup can put the machine back together again, while
> not special casing init means something weird might happen and init
> would be selected.
When something weird happens, it might be better to kill
init and have the machine reset itself after the panic
(echo 30 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic).
Killing all other things and leaving just init intact
makes for a machine which is as good as dead, without a
chance for recovery-by-reboot...
OTOH, I haven't heard of the OOM killer ever chosing init,
not even of people who tried creating these special kinds
of situations to trigger it on purpose.
regards,
Rik
-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST