Re: Linux should better cope with power failure

From: John R Lenton (john@grulic.org.ar)
Date: Mon Mar 19 2001 - 18:12:32 EST

Next message: Tom Rini: "Re: sysrq.txt"
Previous message: Ben Ford: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
In reply to: Otto Wyss: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
Next in thread: David Balazic: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:35:55PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > you can avoid all of these problems. Or use a journaling filesystem ext3/xfs, etc.
>
> So in real live you would propose to put fences and nets everywhere to
> prevent children from possibly falling in abyses?

I think you've got it backwards: from my point of view, _you_ are
proposing the nets, _he_ is proposing the knowledgable and
trustworthy parent looking after the children.

-- 
John Lenton (john@grulic.org.ar) -- Random fortune:
Si le dan dos órdenes contradictorias, obedezca las dos.
		-- Segunda Ley de Brintnall. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Rini: "Re: sysrq.txt"
Previous message: Ben Ford: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
In reply to: Otto Wyss: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
Next in thread: David Balazic: "Re: Linux should better cope with power failure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:13 EST