Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Sat Mar 17 2001 - 17:02:06 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Potential free/use-after-free bugs"
In reply to: Andy Chou: "[CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1"
Next in thread: Neil Brown: "Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Andy Chou wrote:

> Here are some more results from the MC project. These are 16 errors found
> in 2.4.1 related to inconsistent use of locks.

> +---------------------------------+----------------------------+
> | file | fn |
> +---------------------------------+----------------------------+
> | drivers/mtd/cfi_cmdset_0001.c | cfi_intelext_suspend |
> | drivers/mtd/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | cfi_amdext_suspend |

Fixed in CVS some time ago. Will be flushed to Linus some time in the near
future, after I've cleaned up the inter_module_xxx abomination.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: [CHECKER] 28 potential interrupt errors"
Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: Potential free/use-after-free bugs"
In reply to: Andy Chou: "[CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1"
Next in thread: Neil Brown: "Re: [CHECKER] 16 potential locking bugs in 2.4.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:10 EST