>
> I applied the first hunk to version 2.4.3-pre4, as by email with Doug.
> The output for the scsi devices follows and is identical with and
> without the patch. Maybe someone can explain the meaning of the illegal
> requests at the end. Nevertheless, I can use the drive fine.
>
If your testing Doug's patch, it might be a good idea to run with/without
your adapter built as a module, as the kernel is inconsistent in its setting
of "online" in scsi.c: it sets online TRUE after an attach in
scsi_register_device_module(), but leaves online as is after an
attach in scsi_register_host().
So, if the scan_scsis set online FALSE, it sometimes is set back to TRUE;
otherwise, I don't think any other code will set online to TRUE (once it
is set to FALSE after its scanned, no one can even open the device, not even sg).
The online = TRUE should probably be removed from scsi_register_device_module(),
as disks with peripheral qualifier 1 (like Doug's the Clariion storage)
ususally complain when sent a READ CAPACITY. I got such errors when running with
a Clariion DASS (DGC RAID/DISK, scsi attached disk array).
Doug - did you try running with/without your adapter built as a module? I'd
expect you to get a READ CAPACITY failure for each LUN with PQ 1.
-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:09 EST