Hi,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 10:26:42PM -0500, Tom Vier wrote:
> fdatasync() is the same as fsync(), in linux.
No, in 2.4 fdatasync does the right thing and skips the inode flush if
only the timestamps have changed.
> until fdatasync() is
> implimented (ie, syncs the data only)
fdatasync is required to sync more than just the data: it has to sync
the inode too if any fields other than the timestamps have changed.
So, for appending to files or writing new files from scratch, fsync ==
fdatasync (because each write also changes the inode size). Only for
updating existing files in place does fdatasync behave differently.
> #ifndef O_DSYNC
> # define O_DSYNC O_SYNC
> #endif
2.4's O_SYNC actually does a fdatasync internally. This is also the
default behaviour of HPUX, which requires you to set a sysctl variable
if you want O_SYNC to flush timestamp changes to disk.
Cheers,
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:08 EST