On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Mårten Wikström wrote:
[much text]
> Thanks! I'll try that out. How can I tell if the driver supports
> CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL? I'm not sure, but I think the cards are
> tulip-based, can I then use Robert & Jamal's optimised drivers?
> It'll probably take some time before I can do further testing. (My employer
> thinks I've spent too much time on it already...).
I don't really know how to tell except
'grep CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL driverfiles'
You said that the cards where 100Mbit DEC cards, I assumed that by that
you meant that the cards use DECchip 21143 or similar chips.
If that's true you can use Robert & Jamal's optimised drivers.
Sorry to hear that your employer doesn't see the importance in such a test
:)
> FYI, Linux had _much_ better delay variation characteristics than FreeBSD.
> Typically no packet was delayed more than 100usec, whereas FreeBSD had some
> packets delayed about 2-3 msec.
This sounds promising. So Linux had nice variations until it broke down
completely and stopped routing because of all the interrupts. I can almost
guarantee that with the optimised driver and CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL
you'll see a _big_ improvement in routingperformance.
/Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 21:00:08 EST