Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?

From: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz (ankry@pg.gda.pl)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 16:45:35 EST

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
Previous message: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: Kernel 2.4.2"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "RE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Rik van Riel wrote:"
> total usage == maximum(swap, ram)

Does it mean that having swap<RAM you only lose some disk space ?

Andrzej

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Technical University of Gdansk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: magic device renumbering was -- Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20"
Previous message: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: Kernel 2.4.2"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "RE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST