Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: SLAB vs. pci_alloc_xxx in usb-uhci patc"
• In reply to: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> At 21:10 08/03/2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >+ * There is also a hash table mapping (inode,offset) to the page
> >+ * in memory if present. The lists for this hash table use the fields
> >+ * page->next_hash and page->pprev_hash.
>
> Shouldn't (inode,offset) be (inode,index), or possibly (mapping,index)?

> And here, too?

Indeed, thanks.

Rik

--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: SLAB vs. pci_alloc_xxx in usb-uhci patc"
• In reply to: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: [PATCH] documentation mm.h + swap.h"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:10 EST