Re: Forcible removal of modules

From: John Fremlin (chief@bandits.org)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 14:57:22 EST

Next message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Incoming TCP TOS: A simple question, I would have thought..."
Previous message: Steve Best: "Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) beta 2 release 0.2.0 available"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Forcible removal of modules"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Forcible removal of modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thomas Hood <thood@excite.com> writes:

> Sometimes modules need to be reloaded in order
> to cause some sort of reinitialization (of the
> driver or of the hardware) to occur.

Why not set up the device driver to handle PM events itself. See
Documentation/pm.txt under Driver Interface.

I have a race free version of pm_send_all if you want it.

[...]

--

http://www.penguinpowered.com/~vii - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Incoming TCP TOS: A simple question, I would have thought..."
Previous message: Steve Best: "Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) beta 2 release 0.2.0 available"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Forcible removal of modules"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Forcible removal of modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST