Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 09:13:12 EST

Next message: Andreas Jaeger: "Re: 2.4.0-s390x progress"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Next in thread: Mike Black: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Mar 07 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> SCSI certainly lets us do both of these operations independently. IDE
> has the sync/flush command afaik, but I'm not sure whether the IDE
> tagged command stuff has the equivalent of SCSI's ordered tag bits.
> Andre?

IDE has no concept of ordered tags...

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Jaeger: "Re: 2.4.0-s390x progress"
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Next in thread: Mike Black: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST