Re: kmalloc() alignment

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Mon Mar 05 2001 - 08:22:35 EST

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
> > As far as I know, you can count on 16-bytes alignment from
> > kmalloc. The trouble is that you would have to keep the original
>
> Actually it depends on the debug settings

Actually THAT's a bug in the debug stuff....

Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
Next in thread: Philipp Rumpf: "Re: kmalloc() alignment"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST