Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 03 2001 - 18:35:34 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: RFC: changing precision control setting in initial FPU context"
Previous message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: New net features for added performance"
In reply to: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU"
Maybe reply: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Well, from reading the source, I don't see how this can break APM... What=
> am I
> missing?

If you've stopped kapm-idled from using cpu then you've stopped it from going
into the bios suspend one presumes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: RFC: changing precision control setting in initial FPU context"
Previous message: Jes Sorensen: "Re: New net features for added performance"
In reply to: Francis Galiegue: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU time"
Next in thread: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU"
Maybe reply: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.2: cure the kapm-idled taking (100-epsilon)% CPU"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 21:00:15 EST