Re: binfmt_script and ^M

From: Ivo Timmermans (irt@cistron.nl)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 08:47:46 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Previous message: Heusden, Folkert van: "RE: binfmt_script and ^M"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
> > When running a script (perl in this case) that has DOS-style newlines
> > (\r\n), Linux 2.4.2 can't find an interpreter because it doesn't
> > recognize the \r. The following patch should fix this (untested).
>
> Fix the script. The kernel expects a specific format

For what reason? Is it a standard to not allow it, or does it break
other things?

-- 
Ivo Timmermans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Previous message: Heusden, Folkert van: "RE: binfmt_script and ^M"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: binfmt_script and ^M"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:00:14 EST