Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 09:56:03 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: sysinfo.sharedram not accounted for on i386 ?"
Previous message: D. Sen: "Hard drive messages on syslog"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Next in thread: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Reply: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> But the driver _does_ work without the firmware, it only loses the
> hardware TCP checksum on Rx capability. That's what we have in 2.4.x right
> now, why should 2.2.x be pickier and *demand* to have the firmware or no
> support at all?

Ok I didnt realise the firmware thing was tcp checksum paths only. Thats fine
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: sysinfo.sharedram not accounted for on i386 ?"
Previous message: D. Sen: "Hard drive messages on syslog"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Next in thread: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Reply: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] new version of the starfire driver for 2.2.19pre"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST