Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1

• Next message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Slowing down CDROM drives"
• Previous message: Christian Ullrich: "2.4.1: Abnormal interrupt from RTL8139"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1"
• Next in thread: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Feb 11 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The reiserfs nfs problem in standard 2.4 is very simple -- it'll
> barf as soon as you run out of file handle/inode cache. Any workload
> that accesses enough files in parallel can trigger it.

        I'm just trying to evaluate if I should use reiserfs here or
        not: is this phenomenon that you describe above happening
        independently of whether I choose the knfsd or userspace nfsd?

        From your message, I got the impression that it would happen
        with knfsd only, but I'm just checking before I make a wrong
        decision.

        Thanks from a humble (and ignorant) network admin, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - rbrito@iname.com - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Slowing down CDROM drives"
• Previous message: Christian Ullrich: "2.4.1: Abnormal interrupt from RTL8139"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1"
• Next in thread: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST