Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.1

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 15:06:21 EST


> Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
> But I do not see any benefit in doing
>
> unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
> while (0 < (signed long)(timeout - jiffies));

On that bit we agree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:27 EST