Re: [patch?] RAMFS

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Sun Feb 04 2001 - 08:48:33 EST

Next message: Pierfrancesco Caci: "Re: 2.4.1 segfault when doing "ls /dev/""
Previous message: Pierre Rousselet: "Re: 2.4.1 segfault when doing "ls /dev/""
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch?] RAMFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4 Feb 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Yes and no. tmpfs has a little bit overhead for the noswap case but
> this overhead is in the kernel anyways for shared anon mappings. The
> whole vm is using swap unconditionally.

I'm hoping that'll end up conditional on CONFIG_BLK_DEV or CONFIG_SWAP.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pierfrancesco Caci: "Re: 2.4.1 segfault when doing "ls /dev/""
Previous message: Pierre Rousselet: "Re: 2.4.1 segfault when doing "ls /dev/""
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: [patch?] RAMFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:19 EST