Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 13:58:04 EST

Next message: Timo Jantunen: "Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:889!"
Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:889!"
In reply to: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device (241p11)"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If the pci_enable_device() thing is to be added to the drivers, it must
> preferently be placed after the checking against RAID attachement.

You cant check the signature until the device has been enabled. Maybe you
could poke the LSI guys and find out how windows PnP stuff handles this.

I think the proposed change is ok because if the board is enabled then the
enabling code won't touch it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Timo Jantunen: "Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:889!"
Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:889!"
In reply to: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device (241p11)"
Next in thread: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:40 EST