On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Quim K Holland wrote:
> I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why
> the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been
> applied. [...]
> - return_ok = bh->b_reqnext;
> + return_fail = bh->b_reqnext;
oops - i do have it in my tree, somehow it escaped.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:35 EST