>...
> + spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> mm->rss++;
> + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>...
Would it not be better to use some sort of atomic add/subtract/clear operation
rather than a spinlock? (Which would also give you fewer atomic memory access
cycles).
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:34 EST