Re: D state after applying ps hang patch

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sun Jan 28 2001 - 19:31:45 EST

Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels?"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: display problem with matroxfb"
In reply to: David Ford: "D state after applying ps hang patch"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: D state after applying ps hang patch"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: D state after applying ps hang patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 29 2001, David Ford wrote:
> kernel 2.4.0-ac12
>
> # ps -eo user,pid,args,wchan|egrep "imap|update|procmail"
> root 7 [kupdate] get_request_wait
> david 627 imapd get_request_wait
> david 752 procmail -f linu down
> david 761 procmail -f linu down
> david 799 procmail -f linu down
> david 854 procmail -f linu down
> david 886 procmail -f linu down
> david 847 imapd get_request_wait
> david 1079 procmail -f linu down
> david 3280 imapd interruptible_sleep_on_locked
> david 3321 imapd interruptible_sleep_on_locked
>
> and the cpu load is artificially inflated to 9.17

Which patch specifically?

-- 
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels?"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: display problem with matroxfb"
In reply to: David Ford: "D state after applying ps hang patch"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: D state after applying ps hang patch"
Reply: David Ford: "Re: D state after applying ps hang patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:31 EST