Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ?

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@innominate.de)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:47:31 EST


Christoph Rohland wrote:
> As of 2.4.1-pre we pin the pages by increasing the page count for
> locked segments. No special list needed.

Sure no special list is needed. But without a special list to park
those pages on they will just circulate on the active/inactive lists,
wasting CPU cycles and trashing cache. A special list would be an
improvement, but is no burning issue.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:23 EST