Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@innominate.de)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:05:54 EST

Next message: mirabilos: "Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN"
Previous message: David Bustos: "Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> We also maintain the
> per-page buffer lists as caches of the virtual-to-physical mapping to
> avoid redundant bmap()ping.

Could you clarify that one, please?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: mirabilos: "Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN"
Previous message: David Bustos: "Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard"
In reply to: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Next in thread: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Reply: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:22 EST