Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:40:16 EST

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: ioremap_nocache problem?"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Fwd: bug report for matroxfb"
In reply to: James H. Cloos Jr.: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

James H. Cloos Jr. writes:
> What exaclty were the issues with the intel cards and sg+csum?
>
> Any idea how much work it'd require to surmount them?

Getting Intel to release full specs on how to make use of
TX hardware checksum assist with the eepro100.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: ioremap_nocache problem?"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "Fwd: bug report for matroxfb"
In reply to: James H. Cloos Jr.: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 21:00:22 EST