Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 11:51:11 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: new kernel mm"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: ftruncate returning EPERM on vfat filesystem"
In reply to: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission"
Next in thread: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Ok. Good point.
> But remember that parsing /proc for an embedded system is also not the
> most healthy thing.

I dont compile in /proc either. SIOCGIFCONF is enough for an embedded box.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: new kernel mm"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: ftruncate returning EPERM on vfat filesystem"
In reply to: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission"
Next in thread: jamal: "Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:29 EST