On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Matthias Juchem wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2001, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> > This is wrong. You cannot execute libc.so.5. This only works with
> > glibc.
>
> I already thought of something like that (I was not able to test it...).
> Can you tell me a reliable way to get the version other than just looking
> for the version appended to the file name?
> Or is the file name scheme reliable (/lib/libc.so.5.x.y)?
>
Taking a guess here....
strings /lib/libc* | grep "release version"
I'm not sure how reliable this method is either :)
/ Brett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:27 EST