Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

From: Marc Lehmann (pcg@goof.com)
Date: Sat Jan 06 2001 - 16:49:03 EST

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: 500 ms offset in i386 Real Time Clock setting"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] svgalib error in mmap documentation"
In reply to: Chris Mason: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:35:02PM -0500, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
> > Nobody with working brain would read it completely into memory.

Instead everybody with a working brain would introduce another hashing
layer for every block access? I don't think the reiserfs code (e.g.) would
cope with yte another compliation in the code ;)

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: 500 ms offset in i386 Real Time Clock setting"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] svgalib error in mmap documentation"
In reply to: Chris Mason: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST