On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > The other thing is that one of the common cases for writing is consecutive
> > writing to the end of the file. Now, you figure it out: if get_block()
> > really is a bottle-neck, why not cache the last tree lookup? You'd get a
> > 99% hitrate for that common case.
>
> Because it is not a bottleneck. The _real_ bottleneck is in ext2_new_block().
> Try to profile it and you'll see.
>
> We could diddle with ext2_get_block(). No arguments. But the real source of
> PITA is balloc.c, not inode.c. Look at the group descriptor cache code and
> weep. That, and bitmaps handling.
I'm not surprised. Just doign pre-allocation 32 blocks at a time would
probably help. But that code really should be re-written, I think.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST