Hi,
Is the following really intentional?
vmscan.c:122:
flush_cache_page(vma, address);
if (!pte_dirty(pte))
goto drop_pte;
...
flush_cache_page(vma, address);
if (page->mapping) {
Nothing accesses the actual page between the two flush_cache_page() calls,
the first one was added in test13-pre5. Should test13-pre5 have removed
the second instance?
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST