Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Dec 26 2000 - 15:53:17 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: controllerless pci device support"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "Re: cdrom changes in test13-pre2 slow down cdrom access by 70%"
In reply to: Joe deBlaquiere: "Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set"
Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > Not having swap doesn't mean you're safe. Think of any kind of previously
> > unmapped page.
> >
>
> Is there a reason why it doesn't just force that page to be mapped
> first?

You can map it in... But background daemon can map it out in the
meantime :-). You'd have to map in and pagelock.
Pavel

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: controllerless pci device support"
Previous message: David Mansfield: "Re: cdrom changes in test13-pre2 slow down cdrom access by 70%"
In reply to: Joe deBlaquiere: "Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set"
Next in thread: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 31 2000 - 21:00:09 EST