Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

From: Peter Samuelson (peter@cadcamlab.org)
Date: Sat Dec 16 2000 - 18:43:51 EST


[ferret@phonewave.net]
> Do you have an alternative reccomendation? I've shown where the
> symlink method WILL fail. You disagree that having the configured
> headers copied is a workable idea. What else is there?

4.5 more megabytes, per kernel, on my root filesystem. (That's *after*
pruning the extra include/asm-*/'s.) Thanks but no thanks.

Symlinks fail only if you move or delete your tree. By doing that, you
have proven that you actually know what and where your kernel sources
are, which in turn is strong evidence that you are not in need of those
"External Module Compiling for Dummies" scripts.

Conversely, by actually trusting a random script to compile an external
module unaided, the user is all but declaring himself incapable of
messing around with the /usr/src/linux that came pre-installed.

Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:17 EST