Re: Missing ACKs with Linux 2.2/2.4?

From: Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 00:36:04 EST


In article <200011121428.RAA16557@ms2.inr.ac.ru> you wrote:
> Sorry, ignoring some values of timestamp is simply impossible.
> It is PAWS. One packet is more than enough to kill you. 8)

Hmm... Isnt this only important for the first SYN with a Zero Timestamp
which is not very critical for PAWS?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 23 2000 - 21:00:14 EST