Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 04:35:21 EST

Next message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Previous message: David Feuer: "RE: malloc (1/0) ??"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David S. Miller wrote:
> Linux resends 21:557, Windows95 (finally) acknowledges it.
>
> Looking at the equivalent 220 traces, the only difference appears to
> be that the packets are not getting dropped.

This smells of "wrong checksums getting generated", in my opinion.

(This is not my field of expertise. I'll keep my trap shut from now
on, OK?)

Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
*       Common sense is the collection of                                *
******  prejudices acquired by age eighteen.   -- Albert Einstein ********
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rogier Wolff: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Previous message: David Feuer: "RE: malloc (1/0) ??"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:22 EST