Re: ext3 vs. JFS file locations...

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 06:51:10 EST


Hi,

On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:53:41PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>
> The journalling layer for ext3 is not a filesystem by itself.
> It is generic journalling code. So, even if IBM did not have
> any jfs code, the name would be wrong.

Indeed, and the jfs layer will be renamed "jbd" at some point (for
"journaling block device" support).

Cheers,
 Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST