Re: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4 Configure.help

From: Andrew Morton (andrewm@uow.edu.au)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 05:46:24 EST


Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> I'm still not sure why it's been decided not to do fallback or how this
> whole situation is any different from path MTU discovery.

It has:

"Changes to make to the ECN RFC before it goes to proposed standard:
     * If the TCP host receives no response to a SYN packet sent
       with the TCP ECN_ECHO and CWR flags set, to indicate
       ECN-capability, then the sender should send its second
       SYN packet without these flags set. This is because
       there are several deployed TCP implementations that
       don't respond to SYN packets with these ECN-related flags set"

        http://www.aciri.org/floyd/ecn.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST