Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 02:28:45 EST


On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> > Hopefully not. The standard examples (mixer levels, etc) are better
> > handled with a userspace tool hooked by modprobe. This even gets
> > persistence across reboots if that's what's wanted.
>
> Implement a way for a userspace tool to get the correct mixer levels in
> place at the time the sound hardware is reset, so there are no glitches in
> the levels, and I'll agree with you.

If I understand you correctly:

process 1 process 2
open(/dev/dsp)
modprobe->
                  load module
                  init module (can't remember which context, actually)
start writing
                  set mixer levels

Is there any reason we ever want to unblock process 1 before process 2
terminates?

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." 

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST