Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

From: Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 02:12:14 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Keith Owens wrote:

> What do people think, do we need module persistent storage?

Hopefully not. The standard examples (mixer levels, etc) are better
handled with a userspace tool hooked by modprobe. This even gets
persistence across reboots if that's what's wanted.

-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:18 EST