"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
> Date: 03 Nov 2000 19:53:04 -0800
>
> Yes I agree, mixing signed and unsigned arithmetic is evil... Doesn't
> gcc have a flag for unsafe signed/unsigned mixtures ?
>
> Would you consider this patch (or a variant) for inclusion ?
>
> I would accept a patch which made the code set fdmax <= 0 when
> (msg->msg_controllen < (sizeof(struct cmsghdr) + sizeof(int)))
> because it is the sole reason this bug exists at all.
How about this one ?
Phil.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST