Re: USB init order dependencies.

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 09:38:51 EST


Jeff Garzik writes:
> Putting a call into init/main.c isn't a long term solution, but it
> should get us there for 2.4.x... init/main.c is also the best solution
> for ugly cross-directory link order dependencies. I would say the link
> order of foo.o's in linux/Makefile is the most delicate/fragile of all
> the Makefiles... touching linux/Makefile link order this close to 2.4.0
> is asking for trouble. Compared to that, adding a few lines to
> init/main.c isn't so bad.

There'll be quite a few extra init calls going in there then, with lots
and lots of ifdefs ;(
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST