Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 19:56:40 EST


> So other distro's did it too. Why did nobody complain till RedHat
> did it? Because no one else decided to use, as the default, a bleeding edge
> compiler that not only won't compile the kernel but won't even touch a lot of
> userspace code either.

Actually the first people to do exactly that were Debian, who shipped a compiler
that couldnt reliably build a kernel for the time period. Thats one of the
reasons they put in gcc272.

Its good sense to tie large critical pieces of hard to validate code to the
compiler. There is a reason you'll find any good software company maintains
old releases in archives with the build environment to reproduce them exactly

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST