Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 18:52:39 EST


   Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 19:03:44 -0500
   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>

   Therefore for 2.4.x, our concern is whether a particular net driver
   needs further SMP protection internally, or if rtnl_lock (a semaphore,
   not a spinlock) is sufficient.

Thanks Jeff, this is precisely what Alexey and myself have been trying
to beat into Andi's head for months now :-)

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST