Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 17:47:21 EST

Next message: George: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: fork in module?"
In reply to: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:57:34 +0100
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>

kgcc is a redhat'ism.

Debian has it too.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: fork in module?"
In reply to: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Tom Rini: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Nathan Paul Simons: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Gérard Roudier: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Reply: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST